Summary

1/28/2013--Introduced.Prohibits any direct U.S. assistance to the government of Pakistan unless the President certifies to Congress that: (1) Dr. Shakil Afridi has been released from prison in Pakistan... Read More

Status

Date Introduced
Jan 28, 2013

Bill Text

This bill text has not yet been received from the Government Printing Office.

Sentiment Map

Select:

Nation

112 Supporting
2 Opposing
98% 2%

State: CA

6 Supporting
0 Opposing
100% 0%

District: 1st

0 Supporting
0 Opposing
0% 0%

Popularity Trend

Organizations Supporting

No organizations supporting yet.

Organizations Opposing

No organizations opposing yet.

Users Supporting

I support S. 164 ("A bill to prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan until Dr.") because it is a travesty that we through an ally under the bus like that. There will be no trust or cooperation until these things are rectified.

Share
CA
25
restoreAmerica
CA-25
1 year ago

I support S. 164 ("A bill to prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan until Dr.") because I oppose all US aid to Pakistan. Pakistan is the world's prime nuclear proliferator and one of the most prominent sponsors of Islamic terrorism (mostly against India). US aid to Pakistan also hurts relations with India, the world's largest democracy and our most natural ally in the region.

Share
CA
26
Slingshot93003
CA-26
2 years ago

I support S. 164 ("A bill to prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan until Dr.") because there is no justifiable or moral reason to ever throw away taxpayer money on these Islamic morons and terrorists.

Share
VA
1
RandyB
VA-1
2 years ago

I support S. 164 ("A bill to prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan until Dr.") because...not only do I agree; BUT, WE SHOULDN'T BE SENDING THEM ANY MONEY AND SHOULD BE OUT OF AFGANISTAN...NOW!

Share
ID
1
Francis525
ID-1
2 years ago

I support S. 164 ("A bill to prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan until Dr.") because...since the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the president Barack Hussein Obama will not step up to the plate and get the Dr. Shakil Afridi out it is left to the people in Congress to come to his aid and save him. Till we have someone in the position that will fight for the people who help us then it is left to Congress to obtain his release.

Share
TN
3
DocFreeman
TN-3
2 years ago

I support S. 164 ("A bill to prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan until Dr.") because...personally do not understand the whole context of bribing countries. Isn't that supposed to be a federal crime.

Share
TX
22
America.First
TX-22
2 years ago

Users Opposing

No constituents opposing yet.

Bill Summary

1/28/2013--Introduced.Prohibits any direct U.S. assistance to the government of Pakistan unless the President certifies to Congress that: (1) Dr. Shakil Afridi has been released from prison in Pakistan and any criminal charges brought against Dr. Afridi, including treason, have been dropped; and (2) Dr. Afridi has been allowed to leave Pakistan, if such departure is necessary to ensure his freedom.

S. 163 A bill to prohibit any regulation regarding carbon dioxide or other g... S. 165The Indian Trust Asset Reform Act