Summary

2/4/2013--Introduced.Sets a maximum age limit of 40 years for an original appointment to a position as a federal law enforcement officer in the case of individuals who have... Read More

Status

This bill was introduced on Feb 4, 2013, in a previous session of Congress, but was not passed.

Bill Text

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the maximum age limit for an original appointment to a position as a Federal law enforcement officer in the case of any individual who has been discharged or released from active duty in the Armed Forces under honorable conditions, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AGE LIMIT.

(a) Positions Subject to CSRS.--Section 3307(d) of title 5, United States Code, is amended-- (1) by striking ``(d) The'' and inserting ``(d)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) The maximum limit of age within which an original appointment may be made to a position as a law enforcement officer (as defined by section 8331(20)) shall, in the case of an individual who, before the effective date of such appointment, was discharged or released from active duty in the armed forces under honorable conditions, be 40 years of age.''. (b) Positions Subject to FERS.--Section 3307(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Except as provided in paragraph (2),'' and inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph (2) or (3),''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) The maximum age limit for an original appointment to a position as a law enforcement officer (as defined by section 8401(17)) shall, in the case...

Read Full Text

Sentiment Map

Select:

Nation

15 Supporting
5 Opposing
75% 25%

State: CA

1 Supporting
1 Opposing
50% 50%

District: 1st

0 Supporting
0 Opposing
0% 0%

Popularity Trend

Organizations Supporting

No organizations supporting yet.

Organizations Opposing

No organizations opposing yet.

Users Supporting

No constiutents supporting yet.

Users Opposing

I oppose H.R. 461 ("to increase the maximum age limit for an original appointment to a position as a") Ya all feeling the Earth QUaKeS Yet? X Flares YeT? WeaTheR War Yet? Tsunami YeT? NeaR EartH ObJeCtS Yet? Yeah Ya... So I am old equipment you say? Why cause I can't shovel 20 yards with my own tools and mind onto a 35' roof by myself in 24 hours while the green horn is completely clueless? Or maybe you rather have eleven year olds being molested while they run computer simulations for designing dam projects (while the secrets are being stolen via insiders, mossad, USB sticks, CD's DVD's) instead of old school Corps Of Engineers Dam Builders who can friggin LOOK at the materials and know the safety factors. RIP Charley

Share
CA
6
EXPOSE-CAFR
CA-6
1 year ago

I oppose H.R. 461 ("to increase the maximum age limit for an original appointment to a position as a") because...so many Members of Congress are in their 70s and 80s, I'm going to oppose this bill, to make jobs available for young people.

Share
FL
7
willy-um
FL-7
2 years ago

Bill Summary

2/4/2013--Introduced.Sets a maximum age limit of 40 years for an original appointment to a position as a federal law enforcement officer in the case of individuals who have been discharged or released from active duty in the Armed Forces under honorable conditions. Increases the age at which such an individual must be separated from service as an officer to 60 years of age, with an authorized exemption until age 63.

Patients' Access to Treatments Act of 2013 H.R. 462 Utah National Guard Readiness Act