This bill text has not yet been received from the Government Printing Office.
[D, MI] Introduced on Jul 30, 2012
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief to middle-class families. Read More
This bill was introduced on Jul 30, 2012, in a previous session of Congress, but was not passed.
Jul 30, 2012
This bill text has not yet been received from the Government Printing Office.
August 1, 2012 Dear Representative: On behalf of the AFL-CIO, I am writing to urge you to oppose the Republican bill to extend tax cuts for the richest 2 percent of Americans (H.R. 8) and the Republican tax code overhaul (H.R. 6169). We urge you to vote instead for the responsible approach to offered by Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Levin (H.R. 15), which would extend tax cuts for 98 percent of taxpayers and allow for the expiration of tax cuts for the richest 2 percent. The Republican tax bills, H.R. 8 and H.R. 6169, would hurt our economy, hurt the middle class, increase inequality, and make it more difficult to fix our economy or address pressing needs such as job growth, infrastructure, health care, and education. Taken together, these bills represent an attempt to double down on all the economic mistakes that caused our economy to implode in 2008. America cannot afford to make the same mistakes all over again. H.R 6169 would establish an expedited timeline, or “fast track,” for consideration of an outrageous Republican tax overhaul plan that would cut tax rates for the wealthy and corporations, increase tax incentives for exporting good jobs overseas, increase taxes on the middle class, increase economic inequality, and increase the deficit. This proposal is evidence of a mind-boggling failure of the Republican leadership to understand the economic pain that working Americans continue to experience or to learn any lessons whatsoever from the decades of economic policy mistakes that led to the Crash of 2008 and continue to cripple our economy. The Obama administration has rightly issued threats to veto both H.R. 8 and H.R. 6169. H.R. 8 would persist in repeating the mistakes of the past by wasting $1 trillion on tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans. It is time to admit the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 were horribly expensive and did not work. They were supposed to ignite job creation, but the 2000s were on track to be the worst decade of job growth in 50 years—even before the Great Recession. The economic expansion of 2001-2007 was the weakest since World War II in terms of job growth, GDP growth, wage growth, and business investment growth. The Bush tax cuts were also horribly wasteful. They were supposed to pay for themselves, but instead they exploded the deficit and were a primary reason why budget surpluses under President Clinton turned to budget deficits under President Bush. If it hadn’t been for the Bush tax cuts, a lot of layoffs of firefighters and teachers and police officers over the past few years could have been avoided. Looking ahead to the next 10 years, our national debt would be stabilized if it weren’t for the Bush tax cuts. That adds up to a lot of pain and waste and failure. Why would anybody want to keep repeating the same mistakes over and over again? The simple and undeniable answer is that the richest 2 percent of Americans, who benefit disproportionately from the Bush tax cuts, are hungry for more tax breaks. The average tax benefit for millionaires is $143,000, but $1,000 for middle class families. President Obama and Democrats in Congress have taken the entirely reasonable position that tax cuts on income under $250,000 should be extended, while tax cuts on income over $250,000 should expire on schedule at the end of this year. Middle class families would continue to get their current tax benefit of about $1,000. The richest 2 percent of Americans would continue to get an even larger average tax benefit than middle class families—because their income below $250,000 would continue to be taxed at the lower current rate. However, the average tax cut for millionaires would be reduced from $143,000 to about $5,000. Republicans in Congress have taken the outrageous position that they will oppose any extension of tax cuts on income under $250,000 if tax cuts for the richest 2 percent are not made permanent at the same time. In other words, their position is that if millionaires cannot get the full $143,000 in tax cuts to which they feel entitled, the middle class should get nothing. This position is impossible to explain or defend. Not surprisingly, recent polls show the American people agree with President Obama and the Democrats. According to a Hart poll in June 2012, 74 percent favor letting tax cuts for the 2% expire. Other polls have yielded similar results. The issue here is whether the Congress will fight for the 98 percent or the 2 percent. There seems to be a double standard at work: when it comes to throwing money at millionaires, Republicans seem to think America has unlimited resources. But when it comes to fixing our economy and putting America back to work, some of these same Republicans say America is broke and there is nothing we can do to create jobs except throw money at millionaires. Some Republicans also say that that because America is broke, we have no choice but to cut Medicare benefits, or cut Social Security benefits, or cut tuition assistance, or tax health benefits, or lay off firefighters, policemen, and school teachers. America simply cannot afford this wastefulness, and we cannot tolerate these double standards. We have to prioritize our needs and allocate available resources towards the best and most effective way of meeting those needs. Right now, America’s top three needs are jobs, jobs, and jobs. Cutting taxes for the 2 percent does almost nothing to create jobs. If cutting taxes for the 2 percent were the solution, our economy would not have been so sickly even before the Crash of 2008. We urge you to stand with the 98 percent to fix our economy and put America back to work, instead of throwing money at millionaires. We urge you to oppose both H.R. 8 and H.R. 6169 and instead vote in favor of H.R. 15, which would extend tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses.
Dear Representative: This week, you will have the opportunity to vote on two bills that set very different directions for the nation’s economy and families, H.R. 15 and H.R. 8. CLASP, the Center for Law and Social Policy, strongly urges you to support H.R. 15, the Middle Class Tax Cut Act of 2012, which presents a fair and responsible approach to deficit reduction by extending tax cuts for everyone on earnings up to $250,000. This bill is identical to the Senate-passed bill, S. 3412. The bill also preserves many improvements that have been made over the last decade to programs helping low- and middle-income Americans support their families, including maintaining the Bush and Obama expansions of the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit. These programs encourage work and keep millions of Americans from falling into poverty. The federal earned income tax credit alone reduced the number of children classified as poor by 3 million in 2010. Funds received by low-income workers are quickly spent and support local economies. H.R. 15 also extends the American Opportunity Tax Credit, which helps make college more affordable – keeping the American dream of a higher education and a better life within reach for students and their families. It also helps ensure employers have the skilled workforce they need to stay competitive in a global economy. You will also have the opportunity to vote on H.R. 8, the Job Protection and Recession Prevention Act of 2012. This legislation would, in contrast to H.R. 15, continue tax cuts for the top 2 percent of earners while ending improvements in tax credits for hard-working, low-income families. It’s grossly unfair and misguided to continue tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans while raising taxes for those families just barely making ends meet. CLASP urges you to stand up for fairness and hard-working, everyday families by voting against H.R. 8. Extending the upper-income provisions for one year, as formulated in H.R.8, would reduce federal revenues by more than $35 billion compared to H.R. 15. This would force deep cuts to both defense and domestic spending in order to avoid ever-rising deficits. America desperately needs a balanced approach to deficit reduction — one that both raises revenue to a sustainable level and makes thoughtful choices about spending priorities. The prolonged economic downturn has had a devastating impact on low-income families and the working poor. Today, a majority of American communities experience greater income inequality and opportunity gaps, joblessness, and underemployment. As these bills move to the House floor, we ask that you do what’s right for families across the country and support the balanced approach to deficit reduction that does not harm workers, families and children already struggling.
July 31, 2012 Dear Representative: On behalf of the 1.5 million members of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), I urge you to oppose H.R. 8, the Job Protection and Recession Prevention Act of 2012. This bill seeks to extend all of the Bush tax cuts, including those that provide significant tax relief to the wealthiest 2 per of taxpayers at a cost of more than $850 billion over the next 10 years. Our nation must address income inequality and tax fairness. The United States should have in place a tax system that is equitable, and makes maintaining and expanding a thriving middle class a priority. Unfortunately, H.R 8 fails this test and misses a crucial opportunity to improve our tax code. The Republican leadership proposal extends tax relief to those with taxable income over $250,000 for couples and $200,000 for individuals. According to the Treasury Department, the wealthiest 2 percent who would receive these additional tax cuts have an average annual income of $800,000; and nearly 80 percent of the additional tax cuts would go to households with annual incomes over $1 million. Further, under H.R. 8, income and estate tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent would average $160,000. Unlike the Republican bill, the Democratic alternative takes a rational first step toward creating a more equitable and sensible tax code. It would continue the existing tax rates for middle-class Americans, an idea proposed by President Obama and embodied in H.R. 15, the Middle-Class Tax Cut Act of 2012. Under this bill, 98 percent of taxpayers would not pay any additional federal taxes. All couples earning under $250,000 annually, and individuals earning under $200,000, would continue to receive tax relief. However, incomes over these amounts would be subject to a higher tax rate. The Democratic bill would generate more than $850 billion in revenues by not extending the Bush tax cuts for the richest 2 percent of Americans. The savings generated by this bill should be redirected to help fund vital domestic priorities—such as repairing our crumbling infrastructure while creating good jobs, supporting our public education system, maintaining access to health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, strengthening Medicare and Medicaid—and to help reduce the federal debt. Two-thirds of Americans support this proposal because they understand that over the past few decades, the wealthiest Americans have seen their incomes and assets grow at historic rates. Yet, millionaires and billionaires are paying less in taxes today than they did 50 years ago. At the same time, however, the vast majority of Americans have seen their incomes remain stagnant or grow at a much slower rate, often being outpaced by the rising cost of living. America has always been a place of great opportunity, and the tax code must be changed to keep it so and to address the unfairness in the current tax system. Therefore, the AFT urges your strong opposition to H.R 8 and your support of H.R. 15, the Middle Class Tax Cut Act of 2012. Thank you for considering our views on this important matter.
No organizations opposing yet.
No constiutents supporting yet.
No constituents opposing yet.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief to middle-class families.